IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/renvpo/doi10.1093-reep-reaa010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature—Public Land Conflicts and Controversies: The Designation of National Monuments in the Western United States

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Walls

Abstract

Public lands can provide a wide range of environmental benefits. Granting protective status to these lands generally imposes restrictions on resource development and extraction activities and thus often generates conflict and debate among public and private stakeholders. In the United States, this is especially the case for national monuments, which are areas that contain significant historic, prehistoric, cultural, and/or geologic resources. In this article, I describe the controversy surrounding national monument designations, particularly in the western United States. I describe the history and status of national monuments, discuss the evidence concerning the benefits and costs of national monuments and other protected lands, and examine public land conflicts in the U.S. west in the context of economic trends in rural communities. I conclude with a discussion of the future outlook for national monuments and public lands in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Walls, 2020. "Feature—Public Land Conflicts and Controversies: The Designation of National Monuments in the Western United States," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(2), pages 352-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1093/reep/reaa010
    DOI: 10.1093/reep/reaa010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa010
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa010
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1093/reep/reaa010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1093/reep/reaa010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/REEP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.