IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/renvpo/doi10.1086-735744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming Regulatory and Spending Analysis: Introduction to a Symposium on Revising Benefit–Cost Guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth T. Gillingham

Abstract

Benefit–cost analysis plays a key role in regulatory activity in most countries around the world. In the United States, the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-4 provides crucial guidance to US federal agencies on how to undertake a regulatory analysis, and Circular A-94 provides similar guidance on federal spending. These key documents have profound impacts on agency decisions on environmental rulemaking and spending on environment-related programs. In November 2023, these crucial documents were very substantially revised, bringing to the forefront important conceptual questions about the discount rate, how distributional effects are incorporated, the valuation of mortality risk, and how ecosystem and environmental services are included in benefit–cost analysis. While the revisions have subsequently been rescinded, this symposium contributes to longstanding debates by delving deeply into the economic issues inherent in the guidance, presenting reflections on the intellectual foundations of several of the most important topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth T. Gillingham, 2025. "Reforming Regulatory and Spending Analysis: Introduction to a Symposium on Revising Benefit–Cost Guidance," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(2), pages 195-199.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/735744
    DOI: 10.1086/735744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735744
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735744
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/735744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/735744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/REEP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.