IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/nattax/doi10.1086-742158.html

Grading Government: A Deficit Management Scorecard

Author

Listed:
  • Alan J. Auerbach
  • Danny Yagan

Abstract

Before 2004, Congress reduced the deficit when the projected deficit rose. We use Congress’s pre-2004 fiscal feedback rule to grade its recent deficit management. We find that recent Congresses managed the deficit worse than most others, with one half year being the worst on record. Stochastic modeling implies that fiscal sustainability requires Congress to make annual deficit reductions as a share of GDP starting with 0.3 percent next year and summing to 1.7 percent by year 10 — 0.3 percentage points larger than the tenth-year requirement just two years ago. Our “deficit management scorecard” can grade Congress semiannually with each new budget outlook.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan J. Auerbach & Danny Yagan, 2026. "Grading Government: A Deficit Management Scorecard," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(3), pages 735-757.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/742158
    DOI: 10.1086/742158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742158
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742158
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/742158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/NTJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.