IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/nattax/doi10.1086-738582.html

The Paycheck Protection Program: Progressivity and Tax Effects

Author

Listed:
  • David Splinter
  • Michael Love
  • Eric Heiser
  • Jacob Mortenson

Abstract

The $800 billion Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) provided COVID-19 pandemic relief to businesses retaining employees. Prior research has not directly estimated the PPP’s distributional or tax effects. Linking PPP loans to tax records, we estimate progressive effects with respect to income for both workers and business owners. Bottom-quintile incomes increased 18 percent and top-quintile incomes increased 2 percent. About half of PPP relief benefited workers. The PPP also increased taxes and decreased unemployment compensation, reducing net program costs by one-quarter. Net costs could have been even lower (and progressivity higher) without the tax exclusion of PPP forgiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • David Splinter & Michael Love & Eric Heiser & Jacob Mortenson, 2026. "The Paycheck Protection Program: Progressivity and Tax Effects," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(2), pages 409-429.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/738582
    DOI: 10.1086/738582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738582
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738582
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/738582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/NTJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.