IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/nattax/doi10.1086-723206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revealing Values: Applying the Inverse-Optimum Method to Us State Taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Embree

Abstract

The tax systems of different jurisdictions reflect different social preferences about the relative value, or weight, placed on taxes or transfers to each income group. I apply the inverse-optimum income tax method to quantify these preferences by calculating the implied weights for every US state. To capture major features of US state tax systems, I extend the existing theory underlying the inverse-optimum method to include sales taxes, property taxes, and both national and state income taxes. Using Internal Revenue Service data, I calculate effective marginal income tax and commodity tax rates for each state and income level, and use these to find the implied weights for both single and joint filers in each income group in every US state. I observe substantial differences in social preferences across states, and I find weights that decline little above $100,000 and that do not decrease monotonically as might be expected from most theories of social welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Embree, 2023. "Revealing Values: Applying the Inverse-Optimum Method to Us State Taxes," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(1), pages 37-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/723206
    DOI: 10.1086/723206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723206
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723206
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/723206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/723206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/NTJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.