IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj43040043.html

Measuring Fiscal Condition as Need-Capacity Gap: An Illustration of State Aid to Counties in Michigan

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Wang

Abstract

This paper uses the concept of fiscal gap, from the need-capacity framework of Yinger (1986) and Ladd (1994), as a way to conceptualize financial condition and as a guide for state aid allocation for fiscally distressed communities. Using 2011–2019 data from Michigan counties, it calculates local revenue-raising capacity and constructs a cost function that identifies key drivers for varying costs of public service provision between counties. Fiscal gap, which is the difference between RRC and cost measures, measures the extent to which local capacity falls short in meeting local demands. The paper also examines how state aid contributes to filling the fiscal gap. The results show that fiscal disparities exist among regions and counties with different levels of property taxable values. State aid, particularly project-based grants, mitigates these disparities but has yet to close the fiscal gap for many counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Wang, 2023. "Measuring Fiscal Condition as Need-Capacity Gap: An Illustration of State Aid to Counties in Michigan," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(4), pages 43-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj43040043
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ43040043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ43040043
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ43040043
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ43040043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj43040043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.