IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj40010101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State of Virginia Budgeting After the Great Recession

Author

Listed:
  • James K. Conant

Abstract

After the Great Recession ended, incremental revenue growth provided the means for Virginia’s legislators and governors to slowly restore funding to many programs that were cut during that recession. Democratic legislators and governors, however, pushed for a nonincremental change in the state’s Medicaid program, which traditionally ranked among the bottom five states in its coverage. Republican legislators vehemently opposed Medicaid expansion, even though under provisions of the Affordable Care Act, the state could gain more than $2 billion in federal funding and provide health care coverage to an additional 400,000 Virginians. The partisan conflict over Medicaid expansion became the most visible budget and policy issue in three post-recession biennial budget processes, and it led to a budget impasse in two of those sessions. The 2018–2020 budgetary impasse was finally broken through a carefully negotiated compromise that allowed full Medicaid expansion but subjected new recipients, as well as the one million Virginians already covered by the state’s Medicaid program, to work requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • James K. Conant, 2019. "State of Virginia Budgeting After the Great Recession," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(1), pages 101-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj40010101
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ40010101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ40010101
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ40010101
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ40010101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj40010101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.