IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj38020019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interest Cost of Privately Insured Municipal Debt: Does Insurer Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Earl D. Benson
  • Barry R. Marks

Abstract

Just before July 2013, only two insurers, Build America Mutual Assurance Company (BAM) and Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation (AGM, a subsidiary of Assured Guaranty Ltd.) were providing new municipal debt insurance. On July 22, 2013, Assured Guaranty Ltd. announced the launching of the newly formed Municipal Assurance Corporation (MAC). Standard & Poor’s Corporation rated BAM-insured bonds as AA from 2013 through 2015 and rated AGM- and MAC-insured bonds as AA– before upgrading them to AA on March 18, 2014. Moody’s Investors Service rated AGM-insured bonds as A2 throughout this period but did not rate BAM- and MAC-insured bonds. Findings suggest that during the pre-upgrade period, AGM-insured bonds had the highest interest costs, followed by MAC-insured bonds and BAM-insured bonds. After the rating upgrade, the interest cost of AGM-insured issues is no longer statistically different from BAM-insured issues; however, MAC-insured bonds have a lower interest cost than AGM- and BAM-insured bonds.

Suggested Citation

  • Earl D. Benson & Barry R. Marks, 2017. "The Interest Cost of Privately Insured Municipal Debt: Does Insurer Matter?," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(2), pages 19-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj38020019
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ38020019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ38020019
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ38020019
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ38020019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj38020019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.