IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj38010057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Well Does the Risk-Free Rate Predict the Future Rate of Return on Investments? Implications for Public Defined-Benefit Pension Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth A. Kriz
  • Gang Chen

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that public pension liabilities should be discounted using a risk-free rate. However, government accounting standards still allow the use of the long-term rate of investment return for valuation of pension liabilities. This paper reexamines the appropriateness of using the risk-free rate in the valuation of public pension portfolios. Based on historical investment return data, the authors simulate two diversified pension investment portfolios and estimate their long-term growth. They find that the risk-free rate produces a significant downward bias in the prediction of the future value of pension assets and argue that using the risk-free rate for valuation would overestimate plan underfunding and create unnecessary funding pressure for state and local governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth A. Kriz & Gang Chen, 2017. "How Well Does the Risk-Free Rate Predict the Future Rate of Return on Investments? Implications for Public Defined-Benefit Pension Plans," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 57-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj38010057
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ38010057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ38010057
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ38010057
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ38010057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj38010057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.