IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj37020073.html

Risk and Return of Industrial Development Bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Coogan-Pushner
  • Josh Keller

Abstract

This study examines default and recovery performance of industrial development bonds (IDBs) and evaluates whether investors have been adequately compensated for the default experience they assumed by investing in these bonds. Characterized by high default rates, IDBs experienced a turnaround after the Tax Reform Act of 1986, as found by Fitch Ratings studies in 1999 and 2003. This study, which covers the universe of IDBs, updates the 2003 Fitch study with a decade’s worth of new IDB issues to observe and with an extension of the horizon of the bonds in Fitch’s study to 25 years. It finds that the sector’s default rate improvement persisted throughout the observation period. It also finds that IDBs paid large tax equivalent yield spreads relative to U.S. Treasuries. The authors examine whether these spreads were adequate to compensate investors for the bonds’ default experience and for other risks inherent in municipal bonds.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Coogan-Pushner & Josh Keller, 2016. "Risk and Return of Industrial Development Bonds," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(2), pages 73-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj37020073
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ37020073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ37020073
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ37020073
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ37020073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj37020073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.