IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj36020025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bond Insurance: Introducing a Better Business Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Adelson
  • George H. Butcher

Abstract

Today’s bond insurance industry has lost the ability to create value for the great majority of municipal bond issuers. Despite an environment of wide credit spreads, the weakened state of the active bond insurers has virtually eliminated their ability to improve pricing for issuers at or above the single-A credit grade. The underlying problem is that the bond insurers and the credit rating agencies embrace a business model for the sector that presumes an ability to accumulate resources in the future, after the onset of stress. The presumption causes the bond insurers to hold too few existing resources in relation to their insured risks and undercuts both their credit quality and the pricing effect of their guarantees. The solution is an alternative business model that entails a much higher level of existing claims-paying resources in relation to the insured risks. Contingent capital securities provide a cost-effective vehicle for accumulating such resources. Combined with certain operating rules and continuous quantitative testing of credit quality, the new business model can create a truly strong, stable, and transparent bond insurer.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Adelson & George H. Butcher, 2015. "Bond Insurance: Introducing a Better Business Model," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(2), pages 25-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj36020025
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ36020025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ36020025
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ36020025
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ36020025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj36020025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.