IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj36010051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Municipal Aid Evaluation and Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Zhao

Abstract

The distribution of unrestricted municipal aid has been a major policy concern in many states. Using Massachusetts as a case study, this paper examines the extent to which unrestricted municipal aid is responsive to the variation in the underlying fiscal health of municipalities. The paper uses a measure of “non-school cost-capacity gap”—based on local economic and social characteristics outside the direct control of local officials—to indicate the underlying fiscal health of cities and towns. The analysis finds that there are large disparities in municipal gaps among Massachusetts cities and towns and that those disparities have increased in recent years. However, unrestricted municipal aid has not been highly correlated with municipal gaps. This pattern is partly due to large ad hoc cuts in state aid over the past 20 years. This paper suggests that the state consider adopting a gap-based formula that provides more aid to communities facing larger municipal gaps. Policymakers should carefully readjust policy parameters in the formula over time to maintain the political feasibility of the approach. The gap-based framework and policy suggestions are potentially applicable to other states.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Zhao, 2015. "Municipal Aid Evaluation and Reform," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 51-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj36010051
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ36010051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ36010051
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ36010051
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ36010051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj36010051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.