IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj32030037.html

The Subprime Crisis, Bond Insurers’ Credit Risk, and the Interest Cost of Municipal Bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Gao Liu

Abstract

Although municipal bond insurance can lower the risks associated with municipal bonds by providing a financial guarantee, it also transfers insurers’ credit risks to the bonds that they guarantee. The responses of the markets in the recent insurer credit crisis have demonstrated this risk. This article reviews the dramatic changes in the municipal bond insurance market during the recent subprime crisis and examines how the market incorporates the credit risk of bond insurers into the bond borrowing cost. The results show that insurers with a higher credit rating can save issuers more interest costs than can their lower rated competitors. After the insurer credit crisis, benefits associated with municipal bond insurance decreased dramatically. However, insurance policies provided by multiple insurers may generate a significantly larger interest savings after the insurer credit crisis than before, suggesting that using insurers is advantageous. The paper also finds that in the sample reviewed, the bond price associated with bond insurance changed at the announcement of an insurer loss, long before the actual downgrade.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao Liu, 2011. "The Subprime Crisis, Bond Insurers’ Credit Risk, and the Interest Cost of Municipal Bonds," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(3), pages 37-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj32030037
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ32030037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ32030037
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ32030037
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ32030037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj32030037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.