IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj32020063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Readily Identifiable Riskiest Municipal Securities: Due Diligence Does Make a Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. Doty

Abstract

It is important to place risks associated with municipal securities issues in an appropriately directed context. Significant proportions of municipal securities—those supported by unlimited tax general obligation credits or by the revenue credits of well-established traditional government enterprises—are safe. Very few of those securities will default, even if their issuers experience significant financial distress. Municipal securities issues dependent, directly or indirectly, primarily (or significantly) upon the performance of private parties or upon revenues of start-up or rapidly expanding governmental enterprises, however, present far more serious risks. These readily identifiable segments of the municipal securities market are deserving of a much higher level of special attention, including attention to feasibility studies, financial projections, appraisals, and other expert work products associated with those financings. The benefits of careful attention to due diligence can be demonstrated by contrasts between default experiences in land-based financings in Florida and California.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. Doty, 2011. "The Readily Identifiable Riskiest Municipal Securities: Due Diligence Does Make a Difference," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(2), pages 63-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj32020063
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ32020063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ32020063
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ32020063
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ32020063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj32020063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.