IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj31020077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons from MARS! Were Municipal Auction Rate Securities a Financial Innovation? Conflict of Interest, Lack of Transparency, and Agency Costs in the MARS Market

Author

Listed:
  • Charles W. Cole

Abstract

By examining the notion that municipal auction rate securities (MARS) were a financial innovation, this paper proposes to develop lessons that can be used by issuers, financial agents, regulators, and other market participants to better assess perceived valuable market structures and security designs. Such understanding and awareness will result in better allocation of financial resources as well as reduced financial risk and cost. Additionally, conflict of interest concerns in the MARS market, lack of market transparency, and associated agency costs are studied with the intent of offering insight to issuers and their advisors regarding the potential cost of such conflicts and how to avoid them. This study finds that MARS does not appear to be a financial innovation and that conflict of interest and transparency issues, if fully explored and understood, may help market participants more fully evaluate the real value of capital market financing vehicles such as MARS.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles W. Cole, 2010. "Lessons from MARS! Were Municipal Auction Rate Securities a Financial Innovation? Conflict of Interest, Lack of Transparency, and Agency Costs in the MARS Market," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 77-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj31020077
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ31020077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ31020077
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ31020077
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ31020077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj31020077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.