IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj30010037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reporting of Infrastructure Assets by State Governments

Author

Listed:
  • Earl D. Benson
  • Raymond B. Isleib
  • Barry R. Marks

Abstract

In 1999, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopted GASB Statement No. 34. This standard requires that governments capitalize their infrastructure assets. The standard allows a government to choose either to depreciate its infrastructure assets or to report them according to the “modified approach.” Under the modified approach, a government must preserve its infrastructure at its adopted condition. For governments that are in a weakened financial or political position, this requirement may be too taxing, so they may opt to depreciate their infrastructure assets. The results of this study suggest that the decision to select the modified approach is related to factors that imply a stronger financial and political system—specifically, higher population growth, a higher grade for the management of infrastructure assets from The Government Performance Project, no use of revenue bonds backed by fuel and motor vehicle taxes, lower lane miles per capita of the state’s highway system, and higher voter support for the current state governor.

Suggested Citation

  • Earl D. Benson & Raymond B. Isleib & Barry R. Marks, 2009. "Reporting of Infrastructure Assets by State Governments," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 37-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj30010037
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ30010037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ30010037
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ30010037
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ30010037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj30010037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.