IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-mfj28030001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do State Debt Policies and Oversight Affect How Much Public Universities Borrow?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Moody

Abstract

Most states have established a system of mechanisms to manage their outstanding debt; these constraints include debt limits as well as political processes. How widely these constraints are applied has major implications for public universities, which may be forced to compete with other state units for scarce debt dollars because they are subject to the same debt limit and need approval from the same legislative committees. An additional factor influencing university autonomy in this area is the type of governing board that oversees public university operations. Governing boards vary in their level of involvement in university financial decisions. This paper provides evidence that governing boards heavily involved in university’s financial decisions have a significant impact on the level of university bond issuance. Furthermore, results suggest that universities subject to state constraints have less debt outstanding than have their unfettered peers.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Moody, 2007. "Do State Debt Policies and Oversight Affect How Much Public Universities Borrow?," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(3), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj28030001
    DOI: 10.1086/MFJ28030001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ28030001
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ28030001
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/MFJ28030001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj28030001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.