IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-738862.html

Disclosure of Tax Abatement: State Governments’ Compliance with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 77

Author

Listed:
  • Howard Frank
  • Hai (David) Guo
  • Yongqing (Carrie) Cong

Abstract

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement 77 on Tax Abatements in 2015 to provide users of state and local financial reports with enhanced disclosure of foregone revenue attributable to tax breaks granted to specific employers with the expectation of future business development. Our assessment of fiscal years 2017–2021 squares with prior research. Disclosure is limited to aggregate total of tax breaks with limited analysis of the economic benefits and costs to jurisdictions. The GASB’s decision to allow jurisdictions to define materiality and threshold amounts of disclosure limits intertemporal and interjurisdictional comparisons and may lead to underdisclosure of abated revenue. Regression analysis confirms that political competition, intergovernmental revenue, state GDP, and political culture are statistical drivers of disclosure quality. High- and low-disclosure states remained consistent over time, suggesting that administrative culture may foster enhanced reporting. Nondisclosure agreements are an integral part of economic development activities and impede revelation of specifics related to tax breaks and their beneficiaries. It is suggested that the GASB may wish to overcome this limitation in updates to the standard via increased use of North American Industrial Classifications in required disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard Frank & Hai (David) Guo & Yongqing (Carrie) Cong, 2024. "Disclosure of Tax Abatement: State Governments’ Compliance with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 77," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 99-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/738862
    DOI: 10.1086/738862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738862
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738862
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/738862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.