IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/munifj/doi10.1086-738349.html

Fiduciary Duty in the Municipal Bonds Market

Author

Listed:
  • Baridhi Malakar

Abstract

This article examines whether the imposition of fiduciary duty on municipal advisors affects bond yields and advising fees. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, it shows that bond yields reduce by ∼9% after the imposition of the SEC Municipal Advisor Rule because of lower underwriting spreads. Larger municipalities are more likely to recruit advisors after the rule is effective and experience a greater reduction in yields. However, smaller issuers do not experience a reduction in offering yields after the SEC rule. Instead, their borrowing cost increases if their primary advisor exits the market. Using novel hand-collected data, the study finds that the average advising fees paid by issuers do not increase after the regulation. Overall, the results suggest that while fiduciary duty may mitigate the principal-agent problem between some issuers and advisors, there is heterogeneity among issuers.

Suggested Citation

  • Baridhi Malakar, 2024. "Fiduciary Duty in the Municipal Bonds Market," Municipal Finance Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 121-155.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/738349
    DOI: 10.1086/738349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738349
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738349
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/738349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MFJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.