IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/mresec/doi10.1086-738235.html

Mistaking Fresh for Wild: Lessons from a Classroom Blind Tasting of Wild and Farmed Salmon

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher M. Anderson

Abstract

Four market-available (in December) fish were presented to students in a master’s course: fresh farmed Atlantic salmon, fresh farmed steelhead trout, frozen wild sockeye salmon, and wild king salmon. Tasters were asked to identify their favorite fish; which they thought was most expensive; whether they thought each was fresh; and whether they thought each was wild. When the king salmon was frozen, 79% of tasters preferred the farmed fish, largely because it is fresh. Many tasters erroneously attributed the bright, clean flavors and flaky texture they like to being wild: 39% of tasters thought the fresh steelhead was wild, though it is farmed. Still, the strongly flavored and lean sockeye was preferred by about a quarter of the tasters, despite being frozen. This mismatch between consumers’ preferred taste attributes and the production attributes on which they base choices implies an opportunity for aquaculture products to continue to expand their market.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher M. Anderson, 2026. "Mistaking Fresh for Wild: Lessons from a Classroom Blind Tasting of Wild and Farmed Salmon," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 49-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/738235
    DOI: 10.1086/738235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738235
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738235
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/738235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MRE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.