The Changing Empirical Definition of Money: Some Estimates from a Model of the Demand for Money Substitutes
Interest-bearing checkable deposits are examined to test whether they should be included in measures of the U.S. money stock. Both Divisia and traditional simple-sum aggregates are constructed on the basis of tests for weak separability in a model of the demand for financial assets. Using nonparametric demand analysis, the authors find that several groups of assets are compatible with aggregation theory. They find empirical support for a narrow measure consisting of the components of current M1A. In tests based on a St. Louis equation and in terms of controllability, a Divisia aggregate performs better than the simple-sum M1A measure. Copyright 1989 by University of Chicago Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:97:y:1989:i:2:p:387-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.