IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/doi10.1086-742715.html

Online Business Models, Digital Ads, and User Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Daron Acemoglu
  • Daniel Huttenlocher
  • Asuman Ozdaglar
  • James Siderius

Abstract

We study online platform business models where digital advertising is both informative and potentially manipulative. Sophisticated users correctly interpret ad signals, while naive users overestimate their informativeness. We characterize the platform’s profit-maximizing business model and show that advertising tends to reduce welfare for both groups. Naive users are overexposed to advertising and become too optimistic about product quality. The resulting increase in demand raises equilibrium prices for sophisticated users as well. Allowing the platform to offer multiple plans can intensify these welfare losses by separating naïfs and sophisticates. Similar results apply in the presence of firm-level and platform-level competition, because digital advertising softens competition. We conclude by showing how flat digital ad taxes can be welfare-improving.

Suggested Citation

  • Daron Acemoglu & Daniel Huttenlocher & Asuman Ozdaglar & James Siderius, 2026. "Online Business Models, Digital Ads, and User Welfare," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 134(10), pages 3252-3305.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/742715
    DOI: 10.1086/742715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742715
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742715
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/742715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.