IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpemic/doi10.1086-733779.html

The Welfare Cost of Ignoring the Beta

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Gollier

Abstract

Because of risk aversion, any sensible investment valuation system should value less projects that contribute more to aggregate risk. But most public institutions use a discount rate that is insensitive to the risk profile of their investment projects. To measure the welfare loss of this rule, I calibrate a Lucas model that matches the traditional financial and macro moments, together with the observed heterogeneity of assets’ risk profiles. The welfare loss of using a single discount rate is equivalent to a permanent reduction in consumption that lies somewhere between 15% and 45% depending on which single discount rate is used.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Gollier, 2026. "The Welfare Cost of Ignoring the Beta," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 147-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/733779
    DOI: 10.1086/733779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733779
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733779
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/733779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/733779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPEMI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.