IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpemic/doi10.1086-729535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Reactions to Failure in High-Stakes Competition: Evidence from the National College Entrance Exam Retakes

Author

Listed:
  • Le Kang
  • Ziteng Lei
  • Yang Song
  • Peng Zhang

Abstract

We document gender differences in reactions to failure in the National College Entrance Exam in China. Using administrative data from Ningxia province and a regression discontinuity design, we find that students who narrowly miss the tier-2 university cutoff exhibit an 8 percentage point increase in their likelihood of retaking the exam, and that retaking improves exam performance substantially. Notably, the response to this failure is much larger for men than for women. Survey evidence suggests that gender differences in psychological costs of retaking, parental education expectations, and some noncognitive traits can explain an important part of gender differences in retake willingness.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Kang & Ziteng Lei & Yang Song & Peng Zhang, 2024. "Gender Differences in Reactions to Failure in High-Stakes Competition: Evidence from the National College Entrance Exam Retakes," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 355-397.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/729535
    DOI: 10.1086/729535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729535
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729535
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/729535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemic:doi:10.1086/729535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPEMI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.