An Exception to the Risk Preference Anomaly
The theory of risk bearing implies risk aversion. In every published study of horse race betting known to the authors, however, investigators reject this implication in favor of "ri sk-loving" behavior. Using the techniques of these studies, the auth ors examine a new data set from Hong Kong and find a rather different result: Hong Kong bettors seem to be either risk neutral or risk ave rse. A striking difference between the Hong Kong data and the previou sly studied North American data is the much larger betting volume per race. Copyright 1988 by the University of Chicago.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:61:y:1988:i:3:p:337-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.