IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-742147.html

A (Plea) Offer You Can Refuse

Author

Listed:
  • David S. Abrams
  • Viet Nguyen
  • Aurélie Ouss
  • Julia Reinhold

Abstract

Plea bargaining is ubiquitous in the United States, yet lack of data on rejected plea offers constrains empirical analysis. We compile novel data covering all initial plea offers for 23,000 felony cases in Philadelphia from 2012 to 2017. Our analysis yields three main insights. First, rejected initial offers are on average longer than eventual sentences, even for defendants convicted at trial. This contradicts the conventional trial penalty theory, namely, that rejecting a plea offer leads to a longer sentence. Second, using accepted offers as counterfactuals for rejected offers can lead to inaccurate estimates of the magnitude and even direction of the trial penalty. Third, even after controlling for detailed observables, initial plea offers are longer for Black defendants, especially those detained pretrial. Our study highlights the complexity of bargaining dynamics and the need for new theoretical frameworks and data on rejected offers to inform both theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • David S. Abrams & Viet Nguyen & Aurélie Ouss & Julia Reinhold, 2026. "A (Plea) Offer You Can Refuse," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(2), pages 277-316.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/742147
    DOI: 10.1086/742147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742147
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742147
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/742147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.