IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-742146.html

Digital Markets and Hidden Noncompliance

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Zac
  • Stefan Bechtold
  • Pablo Wey
  • David Rodríguez
  • Jose M. Del Alamo

Abstract

Regulatory oversight in digital markets faces a significant challenge. With millions of websites, apps, and service providers, monitoring compliance at scale is daunting. Existing empirical research often relies on firms’ self-reported compliance. We argue that such an approach, while convenient, may systematically understate actual noncompliance. Using European privacy law as a case study—and focusing on the fallout from the European Court of Justice’s 2020 invalidation of the EU-US Privacy Shield—we examine how over 2,500 apps from the Spanish Google Play store responded to this legal shift. We find divergence between firms’ stated privacy policies and their cross-border data transfers. Drawing on tools from information technology security research to observe data flows, we show that traditional empirical legal methods may miss over 70 percent of privacy violations. These findings raise important questions for privacy scholarship and regulatory design, particularly in settings marked by limited observability and high information asymmetry.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Zac & Stefan Bechtold & Pablo Wey & David Rodríguez & Jose M. Del Alamo, 2026. "Digital Markets and Hidden Noncompliance," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(2), pages 433-461.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/742146
    DOI: 10.1086/742146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742146
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742146
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/742146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.