IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-736135.html

Standardization and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting: Evidence from Startup Company Charters

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Bartlett

Abstract

This study examines the standardization of venture capital contracts following the 2003 release of the National Venture Capital Association’s model charter. Among nearly 5,000 Series A startup charters, model adoption rose from 2 percent in 2004 to 84 percent by 2022, driven largely by six major law firms. Delaware incorporation also increased from 63 percent to 100 percent, reflecting the model’s assumption of a Delaware corporation. Despite growing contract standardization, capital structures have become more complex: In 2004, 83 percent of charters authorized only Series A preferred stock and one class of common stock, compared with 4 percent by 2022 due to the prior issuance of seed-stage securities and, to a lesser extent, dual-class common stock. Overall, firms’ Series A financings have standardized, but their capital structures have become more complex because of the growing role of seed-stage capital, making Series A startups more mature today than in 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Bartlett, 2026. "Standardization and Innovation in Venture Capital Contracting: Evidence from Startup Company Charters," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(1), pages 83-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/736135
    DOI: 10.1086/736135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736135
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736135
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/736135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/736135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.