IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-734867.html

Live Broadcasting the Courtroom: A Field Experiment Using Real Trials

Author

Listed:
  • John Zhuang Liu
  • Yingmao Tang

Abstract

We conducted an experiment to study the effects of live broadcasting in the courtroom. Collaborating with a court in China, we randomly assigned trials to be broadcast live on the Internet during a 4-week period. We found that live broadcasting significantly affects the behavior of the parties to the trials. Their average speaking speed was slower during a live broadcast and did not return to normal after the first several minutes, implying that they were cautious or nervous. Meanwhile, the parties’ statements became less informative. In contrast, the repeat players, that is, judges and lawyers, became more stable and less emotional during a live stream. Judges also used more legalese to behave more formally in court. Contrary to prevalent theories, we did not find that live streaming diverted judges’ attention, limited their questioning, or affected court decisions. Nor did we find that lawyers played to the cameras or became more voluble.

Suggested Citation

  • John Zhuang Liu & Yingmao Tang, 2026. "Live Broadcasting the Courtroom: A Field Experiment Using Real Trials," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(1), pages 237-276.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734867
    DOI: 10.1086/734867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734867
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734867
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.