IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-734866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empty Reasons? Evidence from a Natural Experiment on the Effect of Public Reasoning Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Edward H. Stiglitz

Abstract

Norms of reason-giving rest at the foundation of public institutions, plausibly disciplining officials where financial and electoral incentives do not apply. Yet do requirements for reason-giving induce officials to pursue statutory objectives or behave prosocially? Little observational evidence exists on this question. I study a natural experiment in federal procurement in which contracting officials were required to provide reasons if they awarded certain noncompetitive contracts but only if valued above a statutory threshold. Using a difference-in-differences design, I find that the reason-giving requirement substantially increased the probability that officials competed contracts, thus complying with the statutory objective. I also explore a discontinuity design but discover sorting around the threshold by sophisticated entities, further supporting the materiality of reason-giving. Secondary results suggest the requirement reduced the volume of contracts awarded and altered the composition of firms receiving contracts. These findings speak to the force of reason-giving requirements and their complex trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward H. Stiglitz, 2025. "Empty Reasons? Evidence from a Natural Experiment on the Effect of Public Reasoning Requirements," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(2), pages 413-452.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734866
    DOI: 10.1086/734866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734866
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734866
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.