IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-734034.html

On the Law of the Household: The Principles Used by Parents in Disciplining Their Children

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Shavell

Abstract

The basic principles that parents employ in disciplining their children in the household are described in the first part of this article. The description is based on a survey of parents, the major results of which are that parental disciplinary actions are premised on wrongdoing—not on the mere causation of harm; that parental sanctions are usually greater when wrongdoing results in harm than otherwise; that sanctions for intentionally harmful conduct tend to exceed those for negligence; and that sanctions are not increased when the probability that wrongdoing would be discovered is low. A theory is then developed to explain these principles as largely functional for parents. The kernel of the theory is that the rules of discipline foster the utility of parents—assuming that parental utility is reduced by the occurrence of harm and that their utility rises and falls with the well-being of their children.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Shavell, 2026. "On the Law of the Household: The Principles Used by Parents in Disciplining Their Children," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(1), pages 29-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734034
    DOI: 10.1086/734034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734034
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734034
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/734034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.