IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-705548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epstein on Private Discrimination: Searching for Common Ground

Author

Listed:
  • Richard H. McAdams

Abstract

In the midst of a brilliantly independent academic career, Richard Epstein wrote perhaps his most contrarian work in 1992: Forbidden Grounds: The Case against Employment Discrimination Laws. In this short essay, I ask whether there can be any common ground between Epstein and those who generally defend laws against private discrimination, including myself. One possibility is the more subtle contribution Epstein makes in shifting the evaluative discourse from the deontological to the consequential. Without agreeing with his assessment of costs and benefits, one can embrace Epstein’s normative framework (even) in this legal domain. As Epstein provides a compendium of costs to employment discrimination laws, I offer here a compendium of possible benefits against which the costs should be weighed. Doing so leaves plenty of room for disagreement but perhaps surprisingly provides additional support for Epstein’s critique of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard H. McAdams, 2021. "Epstein on Private Discrimination: Searching for Common Ground," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(S2), pages 293-312.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/705548
    DOI: 10.1086/705548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/705548
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/705548
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/705548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/705548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.