IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-742862.html

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Reforms around the World: Evidence on Firm Value and Externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Aonan Sistine Sun
  • Kun Tracy Wang
  • Yue Rio Wu
  • Nathan Zhenghang Zhu

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting reforms are increasingly being adopted worldwide, with unclear implications for firm value and externalities. Using a novel dataset of global CSR reporting reforms and a stacked difference-in-differences design, we find that treated firms experience a 9.25 percent decline in value but a 16.4 percent reduction in CO2 and CO2 equivalents emissions and a 10.27 percent increase in CSR ratings. Effects are stronger under reforms that require greenhouse gas disclosures, lack safe harbor provisions, do not recommend a specific reporting framework, or do not mandate external assurance. Stronger changes also emerge in jurisdictions with weaker stakeholder orientation and more developed market institutions and among firms without CSR-contingent executive compensation or with weaker CSR transparency and performance. Country-level reform jurisdictions reduce emissions by 40.75 million metric tons, yielding societal savings of $7.5 billion. Overall, CSR reporting reforms reduce firm value but generate significant societal and environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Aonan Sistine Sun & Kun Tracy Wang & Yue Rio Wu & Nathan Zhenghang Zhu, 2026. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Reforms around the World: Evidence on Firm Value and Externalities," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 465-516.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/742862
    DOI: 10.1086/742862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742862
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742862
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/742862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.