IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-738360.html

The Rule of Law Predicts Trust in Journalists

Author

Listed:
  • Niclas Berggren
  • Christian Bjørnskov
  • Alexandra Sandström

Abstract

Insufficient trust in journalists creates space for disinformation. We ask whether institutions can safeguard trust in journalists. Our main finding is that the rule of law is positively and robustly associated with trust in journalists. The rule of law arguably promotes trustworthy behavior by punishing deceit and dishonesty, thereby fostering trust. Robustness checks support this result. Moderation analysis indicates that the relationship between the rule of law and trust in journalists is weaker in low-income countries; this difference vanishes once gross domestic product per capita, a variable strongly correlated with the rule of law yet negatively associated with trust in journalists, is taken into account. A heterogeneous treatment analysis using the COVID-19 pandemic as an exogenous shock to trust levels offers suggestive evidence against reverse causality. Though exploratory, our findings point to the importance of high-quality legal institutions in combatting distrust in journalists.

Suggested Citation

  • Niclas Berggren & Christian Bjørnskov & Alexandra Sandström, 2026. "The Rule of Law Predicts Trust in Journalists," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(2), pages 361-385.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738360
    DOI: 10.1086/738360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738360
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738360
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.