IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-738358.html

Recreational Marijuana Laws and Racial Disparities: New Evidence on Arrests and Deaths of Despair

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary S. Fone
  • Gokhan Kumpas
  • Joseph J. Sabia

Abstract

Proponents of recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) argue that expanding legal access to marijuana may serve an important social justice objective by reducing racial disparities in arrest rates. Using data from the Uniform Crime Reports and a generalized difference-in-differences approach, we find support for this claim: RML adoption is associated with a reduction of 498–561 marijuana arrests per 100,000 persons (over 90 percent) among Black adults and a reduction of 128–145 arrests (78–88 percent) among White adults. However, we find no evidence that RML adoption reduces racial disparities in nonmarijuana drug arrests or arrests for property and violent crimes, and post-RML reallocation of policing resources to fight nonmarijuana drug crime and violent crime may, in some circumstances, widen these racial disparities. Finally, RMLs reduce opioid-related mortality among non-Hispanic Whites relative to Blacks and Hispanics, consistent with the hypothesis that those hardest hit at the outset of the US opioid epidemic disproportionately gain from recreational marijuana legalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary S. Fone & Gokhan Kumpas & Joseph J. Sabia, 2026. "Recreational Marijuana Laws and Racial Disparities: New Evidence on Arrests and Deaths of Despair," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(2), pages 251-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738358
    DOI: 10.1086/738358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738358
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738358
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.