IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-738357.html

Does Social Media Identify the Optimistic Bias of State-Controlled Media? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yakun Wang
  • T. J. Wong
  • Tianyu Zhang

Abstract

State-controlled media, which is subject to political influence, tends to exhibit optimistic bias. In contrast, anonymous forms of social media, which rely on the collective wisdom of crowds and aggregate opinions, are less likely to reflect politically induced optimistic bias. This paper investigates whether social media can serve as a benchmark for identifying the optimistic bias of state-controlled media. Using articles from state-controlled newspapers and anonymous posts from online stock forums in China that discuss the same firms on the same days from 2009 to 2016, we find that social media can effectively identify the politically induced positively biased tone in state-controlled media. Furthermore, our stock return analysis shows that the market perceives state-controlled media as less informative when it is identified as optimistically biased, which provides additional evidence that social media can serve as a reliable benchmark for detecting reporting bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Yakun Wang & T. J. Wong & Tianyu Zhang, 2026. "Does Social Media Identify the Optimistic Bias of State-Controlled Media? Evidence from China," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 693-731.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738357
    DOI: 10.1086/738357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738357
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738357
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/738357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.