IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-735766.html

The Leverage of Terrorists on Democratic Regimes: Evidence from Natural Experiments in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Jiafu An
  • Shiqi Guo
  • Ruoran Zhao

Abstract

This paper quantifies the impact of terrorism on electoral support for incumbent parties in sub-Saharan Africa, using survey data collected during fieldwork that coincided with terrorist attacks. By comparing respondents surveyed immediately before a local attack with those in the same area surveyed shortly after, we observe a decrease of 5–6 percentage points in incumbent support following attacks. This decline is more pronounced when attacks are proximate, target civilians, or incur higher casualties. The impact is strongest in states with weaker institutions, areas with extensive media coverage, and among politically engaged and educated citizens, though an effective government response can mitigate this adverse effect. Further investigation reveals that the reduction in support stems primarily from a significant erosion of trust in the incumbent party, rather than shifts in counterterrorism policy preferences. These findings underscore terrorism’s considerable influence on democratic stability in affected regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiafu An & Shiqi Guo & Ruoran Zhao, 2026. "The Leverage of Terrorists on Democratic Regimes: Evidence from Natural Experiments in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(1), pages 107-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/735766
    DOI: 10.1086/735766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735766
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735766
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/735766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/735766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.