IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-725533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Strengthening the Property Rights of Employee-Inventors Spur Innovation? Empirical Evidence on Freedom-to-Create Laws Passed by US States

Author

Listed:
  • Shashwat Alok
  • Krishnamurthy Subramanian

Abstract

The incompleteness of employment contracts may leave inventors vulnerable to ex post opportunism by their employers, which could curtail their innovative effort. We use passage of freedom-to-create laws by seven US states as a natural experiment to investigate whether laws strengthening the property rights of inventors against employers’ opportunism can foster innovation. We employ a difference-in-differences design that includes a rich set of state, technology, and time fixed effects to compare the quantity and quality of patenting in these seven states vis-à-vis synthetic control states. The laws increased both the number of patents (by 14 percent) and their quality (according to various measures, including citations and the extent of pathbreaking innovation). The increase in innovation was broad, observed for both firm-specific and generic innovation and in firms with and without prior patents.

Suggested Citation

  • Shashwat Alok & Krishnamurthy Subramanian, 2023. "Does Strengthening the Property Rights of Employee-Inventors Spur Innovation? Empirical Evidence on Freedom-to-Create Laws Passed by US States," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(2), pages 369-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/725533
    DOI: 10.1086/725533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725533
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725533
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/725533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/725533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.