IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-724221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Declining Unionization and the Despair of the Working Class

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Chen
  • Samia Islam

Abstract

While the effects of labor unions on objective conditions have been extensively studied, little is known about their role in individuals’ perceptions of economic circumstances. We investigate whether union density affects the subjective well-being of area residents by exploiting the staggered adoption of right-to-work laws in the United States through a border-county design. We find that unionization promotes happiness for those of low socioeconomic status, including non-college-educated residents and current or former blue-collar job holders, but has no discernible impact on their high-status counterparts. Of affected residents, workers stand to reap the most benefit. We also find that the favorable effect of unionization is transmitted through the assessment of improved financial situation, personal health, and workplace quality. This finding highlights the role of pecuniary and nonpecuniary benefits (for example, on-the-job safety, work-life balance, interpersonal trust, and workers’ autonomy) that unions afford to protect society’s most marginalized groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Chen & Samia Islam, 2023. "Declining Unionization and the Despair of the Working Class," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(2), pages 279-307.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/724221
    DOI: 10.1086/724221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/724221
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/724221
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/724221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/724221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.