IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-742163.html

The Potential of Carbon Border Adjustments to Foster Climate Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Timothé Beaufils
  • Joschka Wanner
  • Leonie Wenz

Abstract

We evaluate the potential of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (EU CBAM) to foster a climate coalition. Using a general equilibrium quantitative trade model to evaluate the payoffs of a coalition formation game, we find that the EU CBAM motivates the adoption of carbon pricing in four countries. This results in a 73% greater reduction in global emissions compared to a scenario in which only the EU prices carbon, with the coalition-building effect outweighing the direct anti-leakage effect of the CBAM. This effect holds across a broad range of policy designs and modeling assumptions. The size of the induced climate coalition varies strongly with trade elasticities and marginally with input substitutability. Next to the carbon price level, the CBAM implementation plays a decisive role: a CBAM that covers more products or indirect emissions leads to larger coalitions. By contrast, introducing export rebates renders the coalition unattractive.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothé Beaufils & Joschka Wanner & Leonie Wenz, 2026. "The Potential of Carbon Border Adjustments to Foster Climate Cooperation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(6), pages 1575-1613.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/742163
    DOI: 10.1086/742163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742163
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742163
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/742163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.