IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-741557.html

Satisfaction, Willingness to Pay, and Ridership When Buses Are Electrified

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Salvo
  • Timothy Wong

Abstract

Do citizens value the electrification of public transport? Cleaner and quieter services should increase consumer welfare. Yet this response has not been tested, despite the vast investment planned by governments worldwide. We provide a three-pronged empirical analysis of the demand response to bus electrification. First, commuters alighting from electric buses report higher satisfaction regarding noise, fumes, and smell compared with a diesel bus control. Second, residents of a neighborhood exposed to electric buses for over one year are willing to pay US$0.085 for an electric relative to a diesel bus ride, which amounts to US$20 per resident per year. Consumer welfare gains are US$250,000 per electric bus procured—a neglected demand-side cobenefit in public transit’s energy transition that is similar in size to the carbon savings. Third, ridership is higher on electrified bus lines. This effect increases with the timing, duration, and intensity of a bus line’s electrification.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Salvo & Timothy Wong, 2026. "Satisfaction, Willingness to Pay, and Ridership When Buses Are Electrified," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(5), pages 1353-1397.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/741557
    DOI: 10.1086/741557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741557
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741557
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/741557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.