IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-740147.html

Regulatory Compliance in the Automobile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Guo
  • Sarah Parlane
  • Lisa Ryan

Abstract

This study explores the path-dependent nature of cheating and investment in innovation as strategies for automobile manufacturers subject to environmental regulations. Firms first decide on their investments in innovation to develop compliant technologies. Then, knowing the outcome of innovation, they may opt to activate a cheating device. Successful innovation achieves compliance at reduced costs, while undetected cheating creates the appearance of compliance while eliminating all compliance costs. We show that higher investment in innovation discourages cheating. In contrast, the availability of cheating devices, used either systematically or as a fallback when innovation fails, leads to lower investment levels. We derive policy recommendations relying on comparative statics with respect to compliance costs, the likelihood of detecting cheating, the penalty imposed on cheating firms, and market competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Guo & Sarah Parlane & Lisa Ryan, 2026. "Regulatory Compliance in the Automobile Industry," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(3), pages 649-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/740147
    DOI: 10.1086/740147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740147
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/740147
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/740147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/740147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.