IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-739941.html

The Social Cost of Fiscal Federalism and the Depletion of China’s Native Forests

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyu Wang
  • Gregory S. Amacher
  • Jintao Xu

Abstract

Deforestation has been a major problem in China’s key northeastern forestry region, where the central government sets harvesting quotas, but local state forest enterprises have no incentives to comply with these limits. We develop a novel federalistic two-principal one-agent model to assess the social cost of state forest enterprise-driven deforestation, assuming that state managers make hidden decisions under the influence of provincial and central governments. We derive an expression of the social cost of hidden actions resulting in deforestation, and panel data are used to compute social losses and identify the main factors in these costs. We find the most important factors to be large natural forests and weak signals that the central forest administration has of harvesting. Our results collectively show that first best social cost minimizing outcomes are not possible unless policy reforms are undertaken.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyu Wang & Gregory S. Amacher & Jintao Xu, 2026. "The Social Cost of Fiscal Federalism and the Depletion of China’s Native Forests," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(3), pages 575-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/739941
    DOI: 10.1086/739941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/739941
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/739941
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/739941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/739941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.