IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-737533.html

Quantifying the Welfare Effects of Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Ji
  • Chunan Wang
  • Xiaoyong Zheng
  • Ying Fan

Abstract

We evaluate the welfare effects of China’s electric vehicle (EV) subsidy policy from 2015 to 2019. Our findings indicate that the subsidies primarily transfer funds from the government to consumers, with car manufacturers capturing only a small share. This outcome is driven by EV demand curvatures exceeding one and significant heterogeneity in consumer price sensitivities. We further decompose the welfare effects into two key components: the baseline subsidy based on driving range and the subsidy adjustment coefficients targeting technological innovations. While the latter intensifies competition among EVs, reducing manufacturer profits, it also enhances environmental benefits by lowering emissions. Finally, our results underscore the need to account for nonenvironmental externalities—such as traffic accidents and congestion—as well as the assumptions regarding the transportation mode underlying the outside choice in welfare analysis. Varying these assumptions can yield opposing conclusions on the overall social welfare effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Ji & Chunan Wang & Xiaoyong Zheng & Ying Fan, 2026. "Quantifying the Welfare Effects of Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Evidence from China," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/737533
    DOI: 10.1086/737533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737533
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737533
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/737533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/737533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.