IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-737532.html

Incentivizing Efficient Effort When Monitoring Individuals Is Costly

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Balmford
  • Brett Day
  • Ian Bateman
  • Greg Smith

Abstract

We propose and explore, both in theory and the laboratory, a mechanism to incentivize optimal individual abatement effort in groups of polluters when individual-level monitoring is costly. The mechanism we propose is a hybrid; rewarding agents for the achievement of a group-level target, while allowing individuals to protect themselves against coordination failure by electing to purchase individual-level monitoring. By exerting optimal individual effort, a monitored agent can guarantee their reward irrespective of group behavior. We show that the unique Nash equilibrium is characterized by group members exerting optimal levels of individual effort while not purchasing monitoring. Thus, the hybrid mechanism disincentivizes free riding without realizing monitoring costs. Laboratory experiments confirm that the hybrid mechanism offers welfare gains compared to stand-alone lump-sum group-level incentives and instruments mandating individual-level monitoring. Moreover, the hybrid mechanism maintains levels of efficiency comparable to a group tax but with more desirable out-of-equilibrium properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Balmford & Brett Day & Ian Bateman & Greg Smith, 2026. "Incentivizing Efficient Effort When Monitoring Individuals Is Costly," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(1), pages 155-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/737532
    DOI: 10.1086/737532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737532
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/737532
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/737532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/737532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.