IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-732185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighting the Evidence: A Rank-Dependent Model of Outdoor Recreation

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Holzer
  • Kenneth McConnell

Abstract

Outdoor recreation is among the most popular leisure activities in the world. As it takes place in an uncertain environment, agents incur travel costs to discover the payoff only after arriving at the site. Building on recent developments in behavioral economics suggesting a variety of patterns of behavior inconsistent with expected utility, we specify recreationists’ preferences as rank-dependent. Using data from a 2022 stated preference survey in the East Coast summer flounder recreational fishery, our results confirm that previous empirical findings can be applied to the domain of recreation. As in the case of financial, insurance, and medical decisions, our subjects exhibit a pattern of probability weights consistent with an inverse S-shaped probability weighting function that overweights small-tail probabilities and underweights intermediate and large probabilities. Our results have important implications for the management of outdoor recreation. Finally, we illustrate how our model could be estimated using revealed rather than stated preference data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Holzer & Kenneth McConnell, 2025. "Weighting the Evidence: A Rank-Dependent Model of Outdoor Recreation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(3), pages 599-636.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/732185
    DOI: 10.1086/732185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732185
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732185
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/732185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/732185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.