IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-731788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enforcing Regulation When Violations Are Heterogeneous: Empirical Evidence from US Stationary Emissions Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Almira Salimgarieva
  • Wesley Blundell

Abstract

Enforcement of environmental regulation in the United States is often delegated from the federal level to local authorities. This devolution of responsibility poses a significant challenge when local regulators differ in their knowledge and priorities regarding the harm posed by environmental violations. Using plant-level data from the Environmental Protection Agency, we exploit variation in the application of a 2014 revision to the criteria for classifying severe violations under the Clean Air Act. We find that following the revision, plants located in states most impacted by the policy exhibited a greater decrease in emissions. As a result, the overall emissions-related damages from stationary sources of air pollution decreased by 2.5%, equivalent to $2.4 billion annually. These results provide quasi-experimental evidence on the effectiveness of limiting regulatory discretion and the importance of marginal deterrence in enforcement.

Suggested Citation

  • Almira Salimgarieva & Wesley Blundell, 2025. "Enforcing Regulation When Violations Are Heterogeneous: Empirical Evidence from US Stationary Emissions Policy," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(3), pages 663-699.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/731788
    DOI: 10.1086/731788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731788
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731788
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/731788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/731788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.