IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/eipoec/doi10.1086-738905.html

How Geopolitics Is Changing the Economics of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron K. Chatterji
  • Fiona Murray

Abstract

This paper argues that the significant geopolitical shifts of the past decade require a new approach to studying the economics of innovation. We document that national governments increasingly seek to control critical technologies rather than encouraging diffusion globally. This dynamic is reshaping the pathways and production of innovation around the world—highlighting priorities for both innovation ecosystems and the industrial base. Furthermore, at each stage of the innovation process, the focus on control of innovation is shaping considerations for the geographic distribution of participation. To enable greater control, nations are creating new institutions to shape the innovation ecosystem, guided by the logic of economic security as opposed to the traditional metrics of efficiency and cost. We demonstrate the impact of this shift on the development of three technologies: quantum computers, advanced semiconductors, and fusion energy systems. We provide several implications for economists studying innovation as they develop new research questions and seek to explain the rate and direction of innovation in this new paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron K. Chatterji & Fiona Murray, 2026. "How Geopolitics Is Changing the Economics of Innovation," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 211-244.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/738905
    DOI: 10.1086/738905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738905
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738905
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/738905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EIPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.