IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/eipoec/doi10.1086-738904.html

Should Governments Restrict Foreign Investments in Start-Ups?

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Paine
  • Richard R. Townsend
  • Ting Xu

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving policy landscape surrounding foreign investment restrictions in innovative start-ups. Drawing on recent research, we analyze both the security benefits and the economic costs of policies such as the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act. Evidence suggests that foreign investments do facilitate measurable cross-border knowledge spillovers that may raise legitimate security concerns. However, restricting these investments imposes significant costs on domestic innovation ecosystems, including reduced capital availability, disrupted investor networks, and potentially diminished innovation outcomes. These effects extend well beyond directly targeted foreign investors to affect domestic venture firms and start-ups. We explore design considerations for more effective investment screening policies, including industry targeting, investor heterogeneity, and implementation approaches, as well as complementary policies that might address security concerns and minimize costs to innovation. We conclude by outlining promising directions for future research on this increasingly important intersection of innovation policy and national security.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Paine & Richard R. Townsend & Ting Xu, 2026. "Should Governments Restrict Foreign Investments in Start-Ups?," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 183-210.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/738904
    DOI: 10.1086/738904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738904
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738904
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/738904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/738904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EIPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.