IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/v44y1996i3p485-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk, Crop Choice, and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Dercon, Stefan

Abstract

Rural households engaged in agricultural activities face considerable risks in their income process. These income risks are especially important if they result in consumption fluctuations. This is likely if insurance and credit markets are absent. One possible strategy for household is to take up low-risk activities, even if they imply lower returns. Such response cannot be viewed independently from the other options available to households to reduce consumption fluctuations. This paper focuses on the importance of liquid asset formation for risk-taking behaviour by households. An intertemporal model of consumption under liquidity constraints is developed in which households can choose between income activities with different returns and riskiness. It shows that if liquid asset holdings are large, providing a buffer for consumption shortfalls, then households will be more willing to take up high risk activities. Evidence based on survey data from Shinyanga District, Tanzania is presented, consistent with this prediction.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Dercon, Stefan, 1996. "Risk, Crop Choice, and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(3), pages 485-513, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:v:44:y:1996:i:3:p:485-513
    DOI: 10.1086/452229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/452229
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/452229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:v:44:y:1996:i:3:p:485-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.